Things I Was Never Told

Having spent the last 7 years teaching pre-service teachers and working with districts and schools across Canada it’s easy to see a disconnect with new teachers and the environments they are entering. In times of fairly significant change and disruption to varying degrees, the role of hiring and finding great teachers is much more important than ever before. At the same time young people entering the profession likely have certain expectations that have been shaped by their past experiences in schools. My beginning of term speech to students in my courses goes something like this:

“You’re the winners of education. You got good grades, listened well and did what you were asked. School worked for you. This is going to make teaching difficult for you because education is in the midst of tearing down this system of compliance based success. Yes, many are still holding on to this but it’s changing and you’ll be placed somewhere in the middle of this. You’ll have a tendency to want to replicate the success you experienced in your own classrooms and it may work for a few but understanding this isn’t a plan for all or even the majority of your students will require you to rethink a lot of things. Buckle up, because it’s difficult, messy work.”

I teach one course and might spend one semester with these students. I’m sure they have other courses that might support these shifts, but to be honest from the conversations I have with most of my students I know they are going to be in for a surprise when they finally get hired.

I’m not sure young teachers fully realize the world they are entering and like all of us, have to experience it before they fully get it. But I’d like to give them a heads up to a few issues that perhaps they haven’t quite thought of to a great degree. While there are likely many more challenges and issues with recruitment, here are three things I think are current trends and will only increase over time. The first two are leadership issues and the last one is a teacher issue.

Loss of Professionalism

I’ve written about this before but it’s clear teachers are struggling to hold on to the autonomous nature of being a professional. This isn’t all bad of course. Teaching has a long tradition of being isolated. Being able to close their doors and “just teach” is problematic as we try and move to more open, transparent sharing but the emphasis on “accountability”  has also created a sense of distrust between teachers and leaders.  As well anytime you have an organization associated with unions, you also make it difficult to retain a sense of pure professionalism. In many provinces in Canada, we’re seeing increased tensions between teacher unions and provinces. Embedded in these conflicts is the struggle to retain a sense of professionalism. It’s complicated and not something I think has easy answers but it is a major issue that I”m not sure can be fully resolved under the current system. The tension, for now, will remain.

I’m not suggesting these things are all bad but they do make it difficult for a young teacher to see themselves as a professional. For many young teachers, they are looking forward to having a classroom of their own and focus on the ways in which they will shape and manage their own environments. I would suggest that in many cases, they over estimate this. You are a professional, sort of.

 

Rolling the Dice with Schools

I’m convinced that currently the most important position in the success of a school is the principal. Research is beginning to show this as well. As much as we have diversity among teachers and students, the diversity among quality of principals might have more impact. Over the last decade or so, principals have been asked to take on new roles, much like teachers. The new role and expectations of being an instructional leader is being met with varying degrees of success. It’s an increasingly difficult job. Teacher and student morale is very much tied to the ability of principals to create cultures of learning and care and when they do this well, teachers are generally happy and excited to teach. When it’s not there, schools, with all the other added pressures and challenges can be almost unbearable.

For a new teacher, early success will depend largely on the support or lack of support you receive at the local level. Much of this depends on your principal. Talk to almost any teacher in any district and they’ll tell you which schools they would be happy to teach at and which ones they wouldn’t be. This is almost always tied to the leadership, not the demographics of the students. The retention rates of teachers in the first 5 years is troublesome at best and we know most of it is related to administration. Unfortunately for new teachers they have little say in which school they will teach.

 

You’re Not an Instructor

When I graduated from college in 1988 the majority of my education revolved around instruction, strategies and methods. That hasn’t changed much. Yet it wasn’t long until I realized instruction was only one part of my job. If I had to guess, I’d say 60-70% of my time was spent on instruction and the rest was spent on dealing with personal/emotional issues and a small part on things like designing and guiding individual learning. Those numbers have pretty much flipped over the last 25 years.

As much as young and older teachers hear they need to take on different roles, understanding exactly what this means remains a major struggle for many. In particular I would argue that today we need teachers who are much more emotionally invested in students than ever before. In some cases our schools have great instructors but not necessarily great teachers. I keep hearing the word “relationships” more and more. This idea doesn’t come easily and doesn’t come unless you are willing to have some emotional investment with students. Many teachers did not sign up for this and in the past, left much of this to parents. Right or wrong, more and more of our students come with greater emotional and physical needs that cannot be ignored. In the past, these needs were either ignored or passed off to other agencies. Today teachers are being asked to become more and more involved in the extreme challenges of students that never made it to their classrooms in the past. In addition, as we seek more personal and differentiated learning environments, this requires us to spend more time with students getting to know their needs and strengths and weaknesses in order to design and guide them in better learning opportunities. I think we tend to underestimate what’s involved in this shift and many new teachers and those veterans knee deep in these shifts are find this extremely taxing. If you look at those teachers who are truly in love with their job, I believe they’ve embraced this shift and are seeing success as they move away from instructor and see themselves in these new roles. Our new teachers need to be better prepared to handle this change but instead are just thrown into the fire and we hope they survive.

The answer to any of these issues are complex but my point here is to identify to young teachers what you’re up against. The first two issues I pose here are often out of your control. The last one is a mindset you need to understand and embrace. Acknowledging and addressing these challenges is paramount to the future success of educators and education in general.

On Motivation and Engagement

File this one under “thinking out loud” or “I need help”

It’s no secret to readers, friends and my students that I have a thing with grading. Take your pick of posts and you’ll get the idea:

I’ve recently been sharing this graphic from Phil Schlechty on Engagement:

If you look at how he defines engagement, you’ll see it suggests that it’s simply about learning and grades are inconsequential or at least way in the background. This is essentially my target. Yet I realize for the vast majority of the students I teach they are largely in the strategic compliance stage. This led me to think about a question I might pose to my students:

“If I were to give you an A at the beginning of the class and you didn’t have to take the course, would you accept that offer?”

I’m going to guess that if most were honest, they’d take that deal. I’m not even sure I wouldn’t either. Which led me to challenge myself with a similar question:

“If the University were to give you your stipend and you didn’t have to teach the course, would you accept that offer?”

I realize these aren’t entirely equal and fair questions but it does make me wonder about motivation for both me and my students. The truth is, I really do love teaching. I’m currently teaching at 2 institutions and the pay is over twice at much at one. Yet, I don’t put in half the time. In fact I likely work harder at the one I get paid less at because it’s a newer environment and structure and I need to in order to offer my students the best learning experience.

So I’m struggling a bit. I preach to my students often about how grading is over rated, how I don’t really value them, I want them to focus on learning, not grades. Yet many cannot get past this and yet I’m wondering if I’m being fair given I don’t do what I do purely because I love it. Maybe I’m being hypocritical.

Your thoughts are extremely welcome.

Mapping the Internet

If you’ve not aware of the work of David White and his Visitor vs. Resident idea, you should. It began as a response to Marc Prensky’s Digital Native/Digital Immigrant concept. I actually first discovered this back in 2008 but White has updated his thoughts to reflect the increase in social media the last 6 years. Here, just watch this.

Beyond this basic idea, which, if you didn’t watch the video can be summarized as:

When in Visitor mode, individuals have a defined goal or task and select an appropriate online tool to meet their needs. There is very little in terms of social visibility or trace when online in Visitor mode.

When in Resident mode the individual is going online to connect to, or to be with, other people. This mode is about social presence.

I’ve asked my undergrads to map their version of the internet but I did mine in front of them and talked through the various spaces and tools I use.


Screenshot_5_12_14,_10_45_PM

Let me walk through each of theses spaces and the way I use them. Keep in mind that for me “Institutional” can be swapped with “Professional”. Also keep in mind that spaces will change often and it’s worthwhile revisiting this exercise at least year after year.

Twitter: Likely the space I use most I may it likely should be lowered a bit as it’s pretty equal between personal and professional. The reason I placed it more in the personal grid is likely because I use it more personally than most educators but if you looked at all my tweets, at least half are educational.

Blog: While I do blog mostly from a personal perspective, it is still professional. On occasion I’ll post very personal things but only if I can tie them to  learning.

Instagram: Very much personal use and enjoy seeing the posts of those I follow

Youtube: It’s pretty functional for me. I look for videos for both personal and professional but don’t really reside their. I rarely leave a comment or engage in conversation.

Flickr: This has moved from resident to visitor in that I interact less here than I used to, mostly because of instagram. It’s a storage space for personal photos.

Google Plus: Mostly for professional and institutional, I do check and interact but it’s more out of duty as opposed to seeking interaction and serendipitous learning.

Google Docs: Rarely do I use this for personal use and while it’s largely functional, I do collaborate and use it to interact.

SlideShare: Just a repository for presentations. I usually find out by chance that someone has commented on my blog. I don’t really look at other presentations either.

LinkedIn: I have an account, it has some content but have rarely used it for more than accepting invitations to connect.

Email: Not used to chit chat or connect with people. Emails are generally as short as possible.

Searching: Not sure if there’s anyway this can move to a resident, especially if we’re just talking about basic googling.

I realize asking people if they use a particular tool or service isn’t particularly informative until you understand how they use it. David has done a nice job of providing a process to do this with others as well as a collection of a few examples. It’s an interesting activity that can lead to some interesting conversations. I’d encourage you to try this with your students or faculty.

Who Owns the Data?

Any working in a district or school talking about “data-driven decision making?” I see that hand.

Data has been a big word for a long time. I have a natural knee-jerk reaction to the word for two reasons.

1. In many cases, the data that is being used in schools is often superficial, low-level test scores. Not always but in an effort to have lots of data, the tendency is to go to the lowest common denominator and collect wack sacks of numerical data that fits nicely in a spreadsheet in order to spit out fancy graphs and charts. The minute you go down this road, it’s easy to get lost in numbers and rarely does the conversation move towards determining if the data collected even matters. Good assessment is expensive and messy. These are not traits most schools and districts are willing to tolerate. “Messy” makes for great conversations, but lousy graphs.

2. The second opposition I have is about agency and ownership.  Alan November has been asking for years, “Who Owns the Learning?” which is an important question. But I’ve been asking “Who Owns the Assessment?” I’m not sure we can really give ownership of the learning to students without them having some say in the assessment. Too often students complete work and give it to the teacher as if to say, “I”m done, now it’s your problem”. If a student truly owns the learning, they’ll be reluctant to hand it over unless know they will have some say as to how it’s assessed. Then when it is assessed, they should be able to do something with that data. They should own it.

Lately I’ve come to appreciate data a lot more. Mostly because it’s my data, I collect it and I analyze it. I have apps that track my steps, my sleep, my travel and golf game. I find these numbers interesting. I also know they don’t tell the whole story. Having lots of data can be useful. But the big thing is this is my data, I chose to collect the data and ascribe meaning to it. If someone else were to provide these numbers for me they wouldn’t carry nearly the same weight. I would question why, I would resist and ultimately I would likely ignore.

Schools continue to rely on the power they have over students and treat them like factory workers trying to attain a corporate goal of increased production. Many students play along willingly but at the end, the data really belongs to them.

My own efforts to give more control over assessment to my students provide the opportunity for them to take their learning beyond the confines of the course and value learning for learning’s sake.

So if you’re still a fan of data-driven decision making, let me caution you to consider:

  • Who gets to choose which data is collected?
  • Who gets to analyze it?

If the answer to these questions doesn’t include the learner, I’d suggest you’re doing it wrong. Finally, I also caution my own data collection habits not to be overly consumed by them. Goal setting is a fine and useful way to learn but at the same time, we can be overly consumed by metrics. Behind all that data, there is a story. Ultimately that’s where the real gold lies.

The Thing that Bugs Me

The most challenging aspect of teaching for me is understanding my role and responsibility for student learning. Teaching undergrads, many who are in their 4th year and preparing to enter the teaching field is mostly very exciting. I generally am thrilled to be able to introduce my students to so many new ideas and people that I believe will empower them as they get classrooms of their own. Grades are almost no indication of their potential or future success. The best assessment I have is being able to watch and observe many of them as they incorporate things they learned in my ECMP 355 class.

I’m not delusional. I realize that my class represents a very small part of their capabilities and yet I can’t help being a little bit proud of many who stay connected and do great things with students.

In general, the vast majority of my students put forth a great effort and are genuinely engaged and excited about the opportunities they have to connect with really smart people. I’ve focused on embodying this ideal:

 

Being I’m not delusional, I also understand not every student will be excited about my course. I have students who tell me, “I’m not into technology”, “Social media is not for me”, these responses indicate to me I’ve failed in some way. It bugs me but it’s reality.

What really bugs me though is students who take my course for a credit and do minimal work. At this age, it’s their education and they should be free to put as little or as much effort into learning as they chose. I’m not sure how I should respond to that. Part of me wants to accept this. Part of me is still bugged. The fact I’m the gate keeper of the grades is of little interest to me as a punitive tool. Being that I also match my students with teachers from around the world, I’m always a bit nervous. These teachers give up their time and classrooms and invite them into their classrooms to observe, connect, learn and sometimes teach virtually. Many of these  teachers are not only fantastic educators but are also my friends. When I talk to my students about their responsibilities I recall similar feelings when my own kids would sleep over at someone’s house and I’d be warning them to “behave yourself”. I suppose it was as much about embarrassing me as it was them, but I wanted to make sure they represented themselves well too.

Being my students work is all online, they have to be present and they have to communicate. Lurking doesn’t work. My course is all about being active, reflecting and doing stuff.

So as I write this, you can tell I’m a bit frustrated with a few students. I might normally just post this to our class page but I do so here to elicit some feedback as to what I might do. I do regularly contact students that I think need a push and try to encourage them or offer help. Part of me things that should be their job. If we talk about gradual release of responsibilities, I would think they should hold almost all of it by now. Beyond giving them a poor grade, what else can I do? What should I do? When do we just accept the fact that even as future teachers some just aren’t interested?

Maybe I should just relax and realize for some, it’s just another class and all they want is an easy credit.