I haven’t done many hardware or software reviews but am quite excited about the potential of products like this. Those who read this, know of my passion for video and my quest to make this more seamless and part of classrooms. This is the language of our youth but that’s for another post.

Part of the issue of introducing video has been time, hardware, software and skill level. We’ve seen the use of digital cameras increase as well as the video options of the still cameras. They’ve provided very good quality in many cases. With the “straight to the web” concept, this works quite well and the need for more devices like this increases.

I picked up a Sony Net-Sharing Camcorder for $200. My thinking is this will help classrooms use video more. I’ve seen an increase in usage with webcams direct upload to youtube and flixn, but webcams aren’t usually portable. Quality is always an issue, here’s my first real crack at this camera:

It’s very easy to use. I did import mine into Pinnacle to add some text and a few trims but the cool part is there is built in software in the camera that allows direct upload to youtube. As soon as the computer recognized the camera via USB, it shows it as a storage devices ala memory card and inside that is a folder with the PMB Portable software which  you open to upload your movie. You can  choose from a few pre-determined sharing sites or add your own. You simply authenticate to the site and upload your movie.

The big down side other is the ability to edit. It does come with a simple piece of software you can use to trim but that’s it. If you want to use your current video editor, it must be able to accept .mp4 files which Windows Movie Maker does not and I don’t think imovie does either. David Jakes suggested using Zamzar to convert the video which is a simple work around but again, adds a step and part of the reason for choosing these cameras is to make things simple.

I’ll continue to play and explore but am hopeful this and other similar products will be gateway tools to sharing and creating video.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Powered by ScribeFire.

Related Posts

  • No Related Post

11 Responses to “Sony Net-Sharing Camcorder Review”

  1. Cathy Nelson says:

    Doesn’t zamzar and other converting services degrade the film some? Oh and not everyone has Pinnacle–so now the $200 camera becomes more like $300-$350 (if users plan to edit, trim, or title, etc.) Bummer. But I ma impressed with the quality here. When will you review one of those $600+ harddrive camcorders? Good job on your review

  2. Dean Shareski says:

    I just saw Pinnacle is offering a free version http://www.videospin.com/recommend.asp I think it’s more about the unedited stuff. It requires some planning but still can provide an great way to post learning. I’d use it to capture student learning…but creative people will find cool ways to use it for just the cost of the camera.

  3. Cathy Nelson says:

    Excellent-and you know what, now that you mention it, i think I had heard this but forgotten. Thanks for the reminder. Oh, and I’m getting the promised EdTech Posse mug photo ready (and its pretty scary, but so what?)

  4. Bump on the Blog | The Flip Ultra Videocamera says:

    [...] just finished reading Dean’s review of the Sony Net-Sharing Camcorder and I figured I’d follow his lead and post my thoughts on [...]

  5. Brian Grenier says:

    These flash memory cameras are really gaining popularity. I purchased myself a Flip Ultra recently and posted my thoughts about it at http://bumpontheblog.etowns.net/?p=229. I had the chance to show the camera off to about 40 teachers yesterday, they are all clamoring to get one in each classroom.

    Take Care,
    Brian

  6. Ken says:

    I’m a big fan of the flip ultra also. My 2cents about using it in the music classroom here: http://musicisnotforinsects.blogspot.com/2008/01/digital-video-and-web-site-review-post.html

    Thanks for all the resources Dean!
    -Ken in Seattle

  7. Sue Waters says:

    Quality is really good - even though yet again I felt sad at seeing the snow :(. I will be interested in how your trial goes; personally I have moved from using a digital video recorder to using a digital camera. Quality of the digital camera is great with video, great flexibility with also using for photos and I like to stick with the Canons because they record in .avi format which means no editing issues with free software. Also I like to record short movies so this options works well for me. Can’t see any reason why you wouldn’t be able to edit a movie from your device using imovie.

  8. Camera Card Digital Memory Video says:

    Digital Cameras In Todays Society…

    Digital cameras have become mainstream cameras because they are extremely easy to use and offer a host of wonderful features. Digital cameras connect to PC via USB so you can transfer your photos easily for archiving, editing, and printing. Digital cam…

  9. Ideas and Thoughts from an EdTech » Blog Archive » Comparing little video cameras says:

    [...] got a Flip today and was curious to see how it stood up to the Sony Net-Sharing Camera and my Canon SD750’s video [...]

  10. Mayuresh says:

    Oh! What a wonderful blog!!!

  11. Pocket camcorder first impressions » Moving at the Speed of Creativity says:

    [...] wrote the the post “Sony Net-Sharing Camcorder Review” back in January, and more recently (in June right before NECC) the post “Comparing little [...]

Leave a Reply