Archive for the One-to-One Category

I’ll take these kind of interruptions any day. Working in my office, the familiar Skype chat box sound alerts me to someone wanting my attention. It was Matthew, a grade one student in Kathy’s class. He wanted to chat. This is our conversation:

Matthew:
are teechr sas yes you can cum from Mathew.

Me:
I will come over tomorrow if that’s okay

Matthew:
yes can you cum at 11:00?

Me:
okay, it’s a date!

Matthew:
see you too moro.

Me:
Sorry I can’t come in the morning. It will have to be later in the afternoon or else on Wednesday.

Matthew:
how about 1:20

Me:
That should work. I think my meeting will be finished by then.

Matthew:
OK
do you wont to see wat we havein awr cllas rite nou

Me:
sure

This is what he wanted to show me.

New Laptop

Update: As you can see this was largely a copy and paste job via Skype chat. I inadvertently left the name of the student in the post. Fortunately, Kathy was Johnny-on-the-spot and noticed but decided to check with the parent. The parent was quite happy to have the name left on. Thanks Mom and Dad whoever you are.

I purchased an XO in efforts to consider the possibility of low cost computing and where this might fit into classrooms. I’ve played with it somewhat and was able to do some interesting things but  knew I needed some people better than me to do the real testing and dirty work. Enter Kathy Cassidy and her amazing grade one bloggers. What a treat it is to walk into a grade one classroom and they quickly resort to telling about their most recent published articles. As a former grade one teacher, you just can’t beat listening to them tell you stories about anything and everything.

I showed them the XO and a few things I’ve learned and made them a deal that they could keep it as long as they would share what they learn. (See Mark Ahlness who is already doing this with his third graders) I’ve suggested to Kathy that she allow them to take turns taking the unit home to explore. They’ll discover and learn much better than me. This computer is designed for them. I’ve now added a group of 7 year olds to my research team.

Image: Mr. Shareski Shows us the XO
http://www.flickr.com/photos/57634636@N00/2315119105/in/photostream/

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Today my XO or “$100 laptop” arrived.  It brings with it the cool-looks-like-a-Fisher-Price-toy kind of responses from others. I fire it up and without doing anything, I’m online. (Our technicians had issues with the wireless in their office but it worked without even keying in a WEP code here).  I take a quick tour and have a look at some of the other activities. (The XO uses the term activities rather than programs). Soon I’m stumped because it doesn’t function exactly like my Dell laptop.

So here are the questions that hit me almost immediately: Will kids like it? Is it intuitive? What is required in schools to make it work?

It’s not really about the XO but about the varying devices we carry. I think of Clarence’s recent post on boxes and it resonates with me. The difference that in our country and others with wealth, we’re not content unless it’s shiny, new and almost ridiculously intuitive. We’re dazzled and amazed with the interface of the itouch. We’re begging the industry to make things easier, better, faster, cheaper and for the most part, they are responding. We’re extremely impatient and frustrated when things don’t work they way we think they ought to.

Several years ago, a number of school divisions in Saskatchewan embarked on an experiment with Sun Microsystems to institute a thin client model of computing. The idea was to provide greater access at a low cost.  Some divisions, sold the farm, dumped all their PC’s and adopted this system 100%. Some, like ours, chose to place these in classrooms, maintain existing systems, but hopefully provide students with greater access. If you surveyed most teachers in my former division, they would categorize this as a failure. Many classrooms rarely used the systems for a number of reasons. Lack of training, challenges around support. There were some are continue to be some teachers who looked at the systems, asked what they could do and built their classrooms around what they could do rather than what they couldn’t.

This to me is a critical mindset that needs more attention and promotion. Cellphones, ipods, thinclients, handhelds, laptops and XO’s all have potential as learning tools. But one must understand what each does well.  I realize my digital camcorder can take photos but really unless I’m in a hurry or just need something quick, I won’t use it for that purpose.  The desire for the all in one device continues but I wonder if it will ever occur.

I think about people with older vehicles. Whether they use it as a second vehicle or their primary, most aren’t naive enough to think they have a great vehicle. Most see it for what it is; a means of transportation, not fancy, the radio may not work, they may have to do a little trick to get it started but it works. It gets them from A to B. It’s about perspective.

So as I look at my XO, I want to know what it does well and use it for that purpose. I worry that students and teachers will have similar reactions as we introduce low cost computing into classrooms as they have with our Sun project. I worry that when I take the XO home for my 9 year old to play with that she’ll say, “this sucks”.  It sucks compared to the $2000 laptop she uses. The reason we don’t think cellphones suck are because we see them for what they are and that is communication devices first and foremost. The fact that some can browse the internet, take photos and videos and play music is a bonus. If I started calling a cellphone a computer, maybe it loses some of its significance. As far as the XO goes, maybe calling it a laptop isn’t the best term. Maybe we need a term paradigm for these new flash based devices.  I’m trying to present new tools and devices not simply with enthusiasm but clear understanding of what they can and can’t do. Too often people lose focus and assume too much of a product or service. For example, animoto may not be the tool for a real quality piece of storytelling but it does a nice job of making taking a few images and presenting them in an interesting way. The XO is a courageous attempt at providing lowcost computing to the world certainly with limitations but not without value. The story of stuff seems to be playing in the background for me.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

This morning I worked with Grade 5 and 6 students who all have a tablet PC.  I’ve been talking to them about building networks and wanted to demonstrate mine in meaningful, fun, engaging way.

So I decided to take them on a tour, using some interactive maps and showed them the power of networks, open API (don’t worry I didn’t actually use that term) and personalized learning.

At 9:17 local time I sent out a tweet looking for help. In 2 hours we managed to talk with 10 different people from mostly North America, save for Jeff Utecht who was in Malaysia at a conference.  We got to have a brief chat with each one, found out a little bit about them and even asked one or two intelligent questions.   Using Community Walk (as you can see my community is not walkable) we created placemarks and I added some video snapshots as well.

Here’s the map we created on the fly.

Wedding map to share with guests
CommunityWalk Map - Skype Me

Kids were amazingly focused, running around the room helping each other, teacher laptop in hand right beside her students asking questions, looking like a learner herself, talking to people who help me learn. The students were customizing their maps and adding items of personal relevance and also making connections to the activities and whereabouts of the various guests.

A pretty cool morning.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Powered by ScribeFire.

I’ve blogged about this before and it’s not going away anytime soon. Today Clarence “twitted” this:

That excites me and worries our IT guys. Our IT department is great to work with unlike many of the experiences I hear about. I challenge our IT manager and he challenges me.  So upon seeing the twit of Clarence, I immediately teased him with the news. He responded quickly as usual,

Unless they have two completely separate networks they had access to the network.  Any number of easily downloadable hacking tools and/or virus’ could easily compromise they entire network.  It would be interesting to find out what they have in place to ensure that mission-critical applications could not be compromised?  It also brings to light  a number of other questions:
    

  • Did the students and parents have to sign an AUP?  If so it would be great to get a copy of it. ·        
  • Are the notebooks required to pass minimum safety/compliance standards? ·        
  • Who is ultimately responsible when a security breach/attack occurs?  Note I said when because it WILL happen. ·        
  • How are they connected to the internet?  Is it a provincial system similar to ours?  If so, what are the AUP policies currently in place? 

Currently we are bound by CNET(Community Net which provides high speed access to all schools in Saskatchewan) AUP which forbids access to network resources by rougue systems.   I agree that it is coming however, without a strategic vision/plan not only at the school, the division and indeed provincial level it would be premature to allow rougue network devices on a system.  Many questions/leadership issues that our province needs to address.

These are valid questions and issues that I’m sure aren’t easily dismissed. When I posted a similar article a year ago, Lorne (I think he’s from Manitoba as is Clarence) wrote:

Our division not only allows but encourages staff to use their own laptops at school. These computers are given the same access to the school network that that teacher would have on a school owned machine. The same goes for PDA’s etc. This has been the policy for some years now. There is now a very significant percentage of division staff doing this. The same basic policy is in place for students. They are given the same rights with their own machines that they would have with a school owned computer. Obviously, there is a smaller percentage of students doing this.

I’m going to start by lobbying our province to start changing their policies but in the mean time, one year later, how do you respond to this in your neck of the woods and are we missing something or overstating something?

Powered by ScribeFire.

Gary Stager writes a short but challenging article on why spending money on a laptop is by far a better investment that glitter pens.

The Last Back-to-School Sale Ever

Now grant it, most who read this already agree with this but I try to consider the naysayers and doubters that one to one computing is really the nirvana for educational success.  Many argue that computers are currently not be utilized to their full effectiveness. That’s very true but in most cases it’s because of lack of access and more to the point the lack of change in teaching practice to leverage to power of technology. I also realize that the TOC (total cost of ownership) is greater than the sticker price on the laptop.

Typically a school will spend around $8,000-10,000 annually for every student. I’m not an accountant so I won’t pretend to say that I can solve all of our problems by rearranging spending. There is obviously a high percentage of fairly fixed costs but finding $300-$500 a year extra whether you use existing funds or tax increases has to be worth it.

I think this is more about leaders understanding the value. Money is really not the issue. If parents, teachers and policy makers truly felt it was critical, they’d find the money. When my kids ask if we can put a pool in our yard my response might be “we can’t afford it”. That’s really not true. The correct answer is, “that’s not a priority for our family.”

So when Stager asks, “Why wouldn’t we at least try to make schools better?” The answer….it’s not a priority.

[tags]laptops,onetoone,garystager[/tags]

Powered by ScribeFire.

At the risk of sounding blasphemous, I wonder about the future of the OLPC. I realize and support its intention and likely don’t understand the political, equity and pervasive nuances of the concept but with the cost of the project reaching $175 and deals like the following, is this going to be necessary? Take your choice:

We’ve already people taking advantage of this….if we could only convince school board and IT folks. So you may or may not have Windows? Who cares? Do you think the kids do? Okay all you smart folks, tell me why I’m wrong!

Update: As Steve’s comments bear out, I’m referring to the initiative in North America and Industrial countries.

[tags]olpc,laptops,briancrosby[/tags]

As I pack up for the day, 2 posts grabbed my attention.

  1. Will’s post on the OLPC and especially the exchange in the comments between Gary Stager and Tom Hoffman and Will. The fact that we cannot find a way to provide kids with the essential tool of our day continues to astound me.
  2. Virginia shooting on Wikipedia. It already has over 500 edits.

[tags]onetoone,OLPC,garystager,willrichardson,tomhoffman,wikipedia,virginiashooting[/tags]