Nice one TDSB

Apr 14

Warning: This post was written in about 10 minutes with a fair bit of emotion. While I’m hoping for clarity, I’m there’s no guarantee.
Update
: The story I linked to was from 2007. Someone from the Toronto District School Board was not able to confirm if indeed this policy is now in place.  However, I’ll not retract the post as the ideas and arguments remain valid in my opinion. This is not meant so much to attack a particular school district but simply to address the larger issue of cell phone banning that exists in many jurisdictions.


These are the types of decisions that continue to promote the “us vs. them” mentality.  What incites me is the reason they give for banning cell phones:

There’s the disruptive nature of the phone ringing or vibrating during class.

Students can text message each other and send answers about exams, a high tech way to cheat.

They can also access the Internet over the phones, making it too easy to surf or find answers they’re supposed to know while class is in session.

Phones can also act as MP3 players, another interruption.

And the built-in camera capabilities in them have been used by some students to post embarrassing and harassing videos to sites like YouTube.

Teachers are enthused.

Disruptive? That might be a good thing. But even if we don’t view the term disruptive in a positive sense, can we not involve students in developing policies that everyone agrees upon? In my experience, anytime students are given the opportunity to develop rules, it saves everyone a great deal of trouble in enforcing them.

Students can text message and cheat? Read this.

They can access the Internet over their phones. That’s a bad thing? Potentially but again, consider that if we value the idea of computers, kids are now bringing one with them to class, less cost on the taxpayer and the potential for learning is pretty great. We need teachers who understand the power and potential of having the sum of human knowledge in their hands. That’s an assest, not necessarily a liability.

Phones can act as MP3 players. Good. Heard of podcasts? Even if kids are listening to music while they work, why is that always bad? Perhaps this could be addresses with students as well.

Built in cameras? Could they use them for something like this?

Teachers are enthused? Why? I’d be infuriated.

I’m not suggesting the cellphones don’t cause problems. So do laptops, pencils and power saws in shop class. But until we realize the potential and involve students in developing responsible use policies, this lame approach will continue to be used in an effort to control things. Good luck with that.


cc licensed flickr photo shared by Scott McLeod

Related Posts

  • http://www.marturia.net Ian H.

    I agree completely! This is the latest in a long-running series of bone-headed moves by the TDSB (banning homework, segregated schools, etc.). An education prof I studied under at the U of R had a theory that all stupid education policies started in New York and California, then went North to Ontario and BC. This certainly seems to be upholding that trend.

    Closer to home, the school I’m in has also banned cellphones, but there’s a “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy on using them in the classroom. Our administration is open to the idea of making them more useful, but many of the staff see them as simply disruptions. I have found a couple of simple ways to incorporate them into lessons, but far more useful is our pervasive wifi for student PID access…
    .-= Ian H.´s last blog ..Thoughtful Thursday =-.

    • http://ideasandthoughts.org Dean Shareski

      So Ian do you think the trend relates to the size of these districts? Does large size schools, districts and classrooms lead to carte blanche rules designed to maintain control?

      • http://www.marturia.net Ian H.

        That might fit – lowest common denominator seems to be the order of the day anytime a large group is being addressed. Like zero-tolerance policies on weapons that see butter-knife-weilding 7-yr-olds expelled, these cellphone policies don’t allow thoughtful reflection on what should be allowed. I don’t know if this shows more distrust of the students, or of the staff…
        .-= Ian H.´s last blog ..Thoughtful Thursday =-.

      • dave

        I think that ladder-climbing and quality work are two different priorities. They can both be high priorities, but one is always over the other. When you get into larger districts and upper-levels, you run into more people who prioritize ladder-climbing…and the upper levels of larger districts?

        Whether you agree with that or not, I still like taking it a step beyond. I’m disappointed about cell phone bans, but I really want to know what the process was that let that happen. Until you fix that process, there will always be new crazy decisions.

  • http://www.timchilders.com Tim Childers

    Dean, I couldn’t agree more. While I do believe there are inherent dangers in the use of cellphones at school by a handful of kids that seem to find a way to make everything difficult, the overwhelming good that could come from teaching responsible use should outweigh all of that. On a related note, ETS (the publisher of the Praxis exams teachers take to be certified in the US) has issued a new cellphone policy of its own. If you show up for an exam with a smart phone IN YOUR POSSESSION, you will be turned away and not refunded any fees. I think Forest Gump had it right: Stupid is as stupid does.

  • Isabelle Selak

    I also agree with what you’re saying. I respect the fact that you acknowledge that there are potential problems that could arise from the use of cellphones in class, but the list of benefits to the students who use them responsibly far outweigh them. Like many new tools that have applications for education, we need to make sure that we take advantage and set reasonable guidelines. We can’t let fear of new technology keep our kids from learning in an engaging, effective way. Thanks for pointing that out!

  • http://www.sweetsassystudio.blogspot.com chantelle

    Great post! As educators it is our job to empower students and yet we make them unplug…..technology has so much to offer, enhanace and empower the way teachers teach. As with many things in education a key word is BALANCE! It must have been difficult to let go of story telling around the campfire as a way of transferring knowledge but look how far we have come and now think how far we have to go! (my thesis is based on comm and tech-say hi to prof Couros(Alec) from humbolt if you see him at u of r!)

  • http://teacherleaders.typepad.com/the_tempered_radical Bill Ferriter

    So in the science classroom I worked in last year, I didn’t have a class set of dictionaries. School couldn’t afford them for anyone working outside of language arts. We also didn’t have timers—a real problem when it came time to conduct experiments.

    We didn’t have student responders—there were a few sets in the building, but they were never widely available. We also didn’t have microphones, video cameras, or digital cameras to do any kind of recording for final projects built from multimedia content.

    The funny part is that I teach in an upper middle class community where at least 80% of my students have cell phones and text messaging packages. Heck, just for fun, our students could time and take pictures of each other texting Google for definitions if we didn’t have a cell phone ban in place in our district.

    And it wouldn’t cost taxpayers a dime!

    Our classrooms may be woefully under-equipped—and rightfully so, considering the $40 million dollar budget shortfall we’re facing this year—-but our lockers are some of the most prepared places in the building!

    Arrrgggghhh….
    Bill

    (Who is listening to music while reading your post and writing this comment just to be defiant!)
    .-= Bill Ferriter´s last blog ..5 Questions to ask BEFORE buying IWBs =-.