<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Deep vs. Blog Deep</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/</link>
	<description>I&#039;m here to learn, join me</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:16:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ann Leaness</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-33175</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Leaness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-33175</guid>
		<description>This is a great discussion.&#160; I wonder though if all those willing to jump into a conversation on twitter would have the confidence to jump into a deeper conversation on another site. Twitter is a strange place. There are times I will jump in and feel completely at ease and there are other times I question whether my comments are an intrusion.&#160; Imagining taking them to an Elluminate session is daunting. Am I the only person who feels this way? Just wondering....
	&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great discussion.&nbsp; I wonder though if all those willing to jump into a conversation on twitter would have the confidence to jump into a deeper conversation on another site. Twitter is a strange place. There are times I will jump in and feel completely at ease and there are other times I question whether my comments are an intrusion.&nbsp; Imagining taking them to an Elluminate session is daunting. Am I the only person who feels this way? Just wondering&#8230;.<br />
	&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viola</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-31561</link>
		<dc:creator>viola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-31561</guid>
		<description>Thank you author</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you author</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simeon</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-31558</link>
		<dc:creator>simeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 11:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-31558</guid>
		<description>Сделаем вместе!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Сделаем вместе!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Мамонов</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-31240</link>
		<dc:creator>Мамонов</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-31240</guid>
		<description>Спасибо, хорошая статья. Подписался.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Спасибо, хорошая статья. Подписался.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-31069</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-31069</guid>
		<description>Excellent article that you&#039;ve wrote here! I have set up a Twitter account to run an RSS feed through, just so that it automatically updates with each new blog post that I make, but I haven&#039;t really seen much effect from it, so I think I may also try this tool out too! As it does seem pretty good to be honest.

I may not be using Twitter right of course, so I may have to do some more research on that area of it all and see what happens!

Love your blog by the way, cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article that you&#8217;ve wrote here! I have set up a Twitter account to run an RSS feed through, just so that it automatically updates with each new blog post that I make, but I haven&#8217;t really seen much effect from it, so I think I may also try this tool out too! As it does seem pretty good to be honest.</p>
<p>I may not be using Twitter right of course, so I may have to do some more research on that area of it all and see what happens!</p>
<p>Love your blog by the way, cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Study Ideas and Thoughts &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Twitter Deep vs. Blog Deep</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-31025</link>
		<dc:creator>Study Ideas and Thoughts &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Twitter Deep vs. Blog Deep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 06:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-31025</guid>
		<description>[...]  Dean Shareski   Posted under 16 Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Dean Shareski   Posted under 16 Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-30999</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-30999</guid>
		<description>Someone recently asked for Twitter analogies -- to me it&#039;s like the mini-conversations you have passing someone in the hall or maybe sharing a one-floor elevator trip.  They&#039;re updates, they&#039;re microreports, they&#039;re requests to get together later.

The &quot;twitter deep&quot; stuff often feels like two (or three or four) people who stop outside your cubicle to talk about something -- forming a virtual conference room.  It&#039;s great for the &quot;conferees,&quot; but less so for someone who&#039;s not in the party.  And the conversation (or, more likely, parts of it) appears in the stream of people who follow any participant.

Each to his own, of course, but it&#039;s good to remember (whether in Twitter or in the actual hallway) that your conversation feel to others like you&#039;re tossing Lego bricks at them.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Dave Fergusons last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.daveswhiteboard.com/archives/1266&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rx for health: use cheat sheets&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone recently asked for Twitter analogies &#8212; to me it&#8217;s like the mini-conversations you have passing someone in the hall or maybe sharing a one-floor elevator trip.  They&#8217;re updates, they&#8217;re microreports, they&#8217;re requests to get together later.</p>
<p>The &#8220;twitter deep&#8221; stuff often feels like two (or three or four) people who stop outside your cubicle to talk about something &#8212; forming a virtual conference room.  It&#8217;s great for the &#8220;conferees,&#8221; but less so for someone who&#8217;s not in the party.  And the conversation (or, more likely, parts of it) appears in the stream of people who follow any participant.</p>
<p>Each to his own, of course, but it&#8217;s good to remember (whether in Twitter or in the actual hallway) that your conversation feel to others like you&#8217;re tossing Lego bricks at them.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Dave Fergusons last blog post..<a href="http://www.daveswhiteboard.com/archives/1266" rel="nofollow">Rx for health: use cheat sheets</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy Nelson&#8217;s Professional Thoughts &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 3 - 2 - 1 - 0 - Bling!</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-30981</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy Nelson&#8217;s Professional Thoughts &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 3 - 2 - 1 - 0 - Bling!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-30981</guid>
		<description>[...] for any number of reasons, from a recent security issue to it not being the place for deep conversations. But I love the fact that I had a group waiting in the wings ready to rescue me with a quick [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for any number of reasons, from a recent security issue to it not being the place for deep conversations. But I love the fact that I had a group waiting in the wings ready to rescue me with a quick [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Penny Ryder</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-30951</link>
		<dc:creator>Penny Ryder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-30951</guid>
		<description>This is a great post and it really got me thinking about how I use Twitter. I do enjoy the back and forwards banter that you are able to get going on Twitter. And you&#039;re right, it is generally social chit-chat along with links to check out - a relaxing hobby for the end of the day. When you do get engaged in deeper conversations it takes a moment to switch mode in your mind and pull out valuable thoughts in few words. I like your idea about moving to a room from a Twitter conversation. You need the Twitter format to get the conversation started and find other people willing to discuss, then somewhere else to continue the discussion further with more words. I look forward to seeing how this problem is resolved over time. Until then, I&#039;m going to check out Elluminate. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Penny Ryders last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://teachingchallenges.blogspot.com/2009/01/1st-teaching-k-6-carnival.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The 1st Teaching K-6 Carnival&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post and it really got me thinking about how I use Twitter. I do enjoy the back and forwards banter that you are able to get going on Twitter. And you&#8217;re right, it is generally social chit-chat along with links to check out &#8211; a relaxing hobby for the end of the day. When you do get engaged in deeper conversations it takes a moment to switch mode in your mind and pull out valuable thoughts in few words. I like your idea about moving to a room from a Twitter conversation. You need the Twitter format to get the conversation started and find other people willing to discuss, then somewhere else to continue the discussion further with more words. I look forward to seeing how this problem is resolved over time. Until then, I&#8217;m going to check out Elluminate. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Penny Ryders last blog post..<a href="http://teachingchallenges.blogspot.com/2009/01/1st-teaching-k-6-carnival.html" rel="nofollow">The 1st Teaching K-6 Carnival</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Shareski</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-30934</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Shareski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 00:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-30934</guid>
		<description>John and  Lindsay,

You make some valid points. I think the issue here is the level or intensity of the discussion.  There are many debates that can work fine but I&#039;ve found too many that leave me unsatisfied and wanted an opportunity to hash out in a more suitable forum. 
But as you say John, 

&lt;blockquote&gt;...creates the common area where the discussions can start.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
And I also like Linday&#039;s quote,


&lt;blockquote&gt;Why do we have to be perfect at it, right now?&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John and  Lindsay,</p>
<p>You make some valid points. I think the issue here is the level or intensity of the discussion.  There are many debates that can work fine but I&#8217;ve found too many that leave me unsatisfied and wanted an opportunity to hash out in a more suitable forum.<br />
But as you say John, </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;creates the common area where the discussions can start.</p></blockquote>
<p>And I also like Linday&#8217;s quote,</p>
<blockquote><p>Why do we have to be perfect at it, right now?</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-30931</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 16:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-30931</guid>
		<description>I personally loved how organic the discussion/debate became.  I found it awesome that those involved eventually did &quot;get a room&quot;.  As I am only finding my own voice in this field I found myself following the debate in Twitter, Ben&#039;s blog posting, the comments Ben&#039;s posting stirred and the many blog posts that the discussion has created.

For some I think the conversations do just die on Twitter, but often I think it inspires and gives passion to those affected.  I&#039;m sure many blog posts are created from these experiences and inspires others to dig deeper.  I don&#039;t believe that Twitter cheapens the discussion any, but creates the common area where the discussions can start.

Thanks for the post!

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;John Fergusons last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://samuraiteacher.blogspot.com/2008/12/wordle.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wordle...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally loved how organic the discussion/debate became.  I found it awesome that those involved eventually did &#8220;get a room&#8221;.  As I am only finding my own voice in this field I found myself following the debate in Twitter, Ben&#8217;s blog posting, the comments Ben&#8217;s posting stirred and the many blog posts that the discussion has created.</p>
<p>For some I think the conversations do just die on Twitter, but often I think it inspires and gives passion to those affected.  I&#8217;m sure many blog posts are created from these experiences and inspires others to dig deeper.  I don&#8217;t believe that Twitter cheapens the discussion any, but creates the common area where the discussions can start.</p>
<p>Thanks for the post!</p>
<p><abbr><em>John Fergusons last blog post..<a href="http://samuraiteacher.blogspot.com/2008/12/wordle.html" rel="nofollow">Wordle&#8230;</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay Price</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-30930</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 14:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-30930</guid>
		<description>I kind of like the constraints of 140 characters and I find that those I follow find ways to make the most of them. Perhaps it&#039;s because I&#039;m a writer and enjoy efficient and effective dialogue. :)

Twitter can spark great conversation, and sometimes that conversation needs to be taken elsewhere. Time, I think, will push us consistently taking that next step instead of letting the conversation die. It&#039;s new for many lay-folk and all new things take time. Why do we have to be perfect at it, right now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind of like the constraints of 140 characters and I find that those I follow find ways to make the most of them. Perhaps it&#8217;s because I&#8217;m a writer and enjoy efficient and effective dialogue. <img src='http://ideasandthoughts.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Twitter can spark great conversation, and sometimes that conversation needs to be taken elsewhere. Time, I think, will push us consistently taking that next step instead of letting the conversation die. It&#8217;s new for many lay-folk and all new things take time. Why do we have to be perfect at it, right now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Cummings</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-30923</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Cummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 14:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-30923</guid>
		<description>Hi Dean -

Good post. I agree with Ben G. -- sometimes a service like Twitter is the only immediate way to spark a conversation that&#039;s open to a wider audience than just the crowd of regulars who frequents a given blog. The wide-range of people using Twitter enables a broader conversation with more diverse voices contributing their thoughts. 

As far as the 140 character count goes--that constraint would come in really handy in real life, especially at meetings or presentations where certain folks have a tendency to run long ;-)

Chris

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Chris Cummingss last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://christophercummings.com/blog/2009/01/01/happy-new-year-product-people/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Happy New Year, Product People!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dean -</p>
<p>Good post. I agree with Ben G. &#8212; sometimes a service like Twitter is the only immediate way to spark a conversation that&#8217;s open to a wider audience than just the crowd of regulars who frequents a given blog. The wide-range of people using Twitter enables a broader conversation with more diverse voices contributing their thoughts. </p>
<p>As far as the 140 character count goes&#8211;that constraint would come in really handy in real life, especially at meetings or presentations where certain folks have a tendency to run long <img src='http://ideasandthoughts.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Chris</p>
<p><abbr><em>Chris Cummingss last blog post..<a href="http://christophercummings.com/blog/2009/01/01/happy-new-year-product-people/" rel="nofollow">Happy New Year, Product People!</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Lehman</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-30918</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Lehman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 02:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-30918</guid>
		<description>This is a good post and does make me wonder whether or not Twitter is one of the better options for &quot;deep&quot; conversations.  I think Lee makes some great points with her first comments, many I agree with.  However, I also see how moving the conversation somewhere else, to perhaps Skype, can allow those involved to continue with the 140 character limitations.  However, if someone see the conversation on Twitter, but isn&#039;t able to join the conversation elsewhere, that would be unfortunate.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Chad Lehmans last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://imcguy.blogspot.com/2008/12/netbooks-in-elementary-schools.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Netbooks in Elementary Schools&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good post and does make me wonder whether or not Twitter is one of the better options for &#8220;deep&#8221; conversations.  I think Lee makes some great points with her first comments, many I agree with.  However, I also see how moving the conversation somewhere else, to perhaps Skype, can allow those involved to continue with the 140 character limitations.  However, if someone see the conversation on Twitter, but isn&#8217;t able to join the conversation elsewhere, that would be unfortunate.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Chad Lehmans last blog post..<a href="http://imcguy.blogspot.com/2008/12/netbooks-in-elementary-schools.html" rel="nofollow">Netbooks in Elementary Schools</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Literacy in Context In Another Place: thinking about education</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-30913</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Literacy in Context In Another Place: thinking about education</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 23:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-30913</guid>
		<description>[...] is something I&#8217;ve considered before. Dean Shareski provides a perfect example when he writes about his frustrations with trying to use Twitter for deep conversations: Certainly a great link [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is something I&#8217;ve considered before. Dean Shareski provides a perfect example when he writes about his frustrations with trying to use Twitter for deep conversations: Certainly a great link [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Allen</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-30912</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 23:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-30912</guid>
		<description>Dean, great post.  I am very new to social networking.  I started at the end of September through PLP. Twitter has been an excellent resource for me as I have discovered great blogs like this and have met some great people. My google reader is full of blogs I have learned of on twitter.

I do, however feel that i need to go deeper, but could not identify that until I read this post. I am going to start blogging finally, so I can share as well as read.

I am sorry that I can&#039;t make that elluminate session tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dean, great post.  I am very new to social networking.  I started at the end of September through PLP. Twitter has been an excellent resource for me as I have discovered great blogs like this and have met some great people. My google reader is full of blogs I have learned of on twitter.</p>
<p>I do, however feel that i need to go deeper, but could not identify that until I read this post. I am going to start blogging finally, so I can share as well as read.</p>
<p>I am sorry that I can&#8217;t make that elluminate session tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaymie</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-30910</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaymie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 20:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-30910</guid>
		<description>I find that so often people keep looking for that &quot;killer app&quot; or device or whatever that will do everything (and this goes so far beyond things on the web). I find that attitude limiting and dangerous. The greatest thing about these tools is not the tools themselves, but the connections they make - between the tools/devices and the people using them. Different things have different uses; the challenge is in finding what works for you, knowing what you&#039;re using, and more importantly WHY. 

Thanks for a good post!

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Jaymies last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://jaymiek.wordpress.com/2009/01/01/there%E2%80%99s-nothing-like-a-meme-to-bring-a-blog-back-from-the-dead/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;There’s nothing like a meme to bring a blog back from the dead.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find that so often people keep looking for that &#8220;killer app&#8221; or device or whatever that will do everything (and this goes so far beyond things on the web). I find that attitude limiting and dangerous. The greatest thing about these tools is not the tools themselves, but the connections they make &#8211; between the tools/devices and the people using them. Different things have different uses; the challenge is in finding what works for you, knowing what you&#8217;re using, and more importantly WHY. </p>
<p>Thanks for a good post!</p>
<p><abbr><em>Jaymies last blog post..<a href="http://jaymiek.wordpress.com/2009/01/01/there%E2%80%99s-nothing-like-a-meme-to-bring-a-blog-back-from-the-dead/" rel="nofollow">There’s nothing like a meme to bring a blog back from the dead.</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Kolbert</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-30909</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Kolbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 20:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-30909</guid>
		<description>Dean,
Thanks for clarifying and I see now what you mean. &quot;Heated&quot; conversations are what I see you talking about. If people more sensitively monitored their own conversations so if they see their discourse getting heated, then that is a good time to move it out. Those types of conversations may be the ones that discourage newbies as well. For fear that their comments might get jumped on, newbies or timid tweeters may not shoot out a thought-provoking tweet. 

I still don&#039;t have a problem with &quot;deep,&quot; but we definitely agree that one size does not fit all. Great post, Dean.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Lee Kolberts last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AGeekymommasBlog/~3/498649160/top-10-sitesapps-for-after-eggnog-is.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Top 10 Sites/Apps For After The EggNog is Gone&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dean,<br />
Thanks for clarifying and I see now what you mean. &#8220;Heated&#8221; conversations are what I see you talking about. If people more sensitively monitored their own conversations so if they see their discourse getting heated, then that is a good time to move it out. Those types of conversations may be the ones that discourage newbies as well. For fear that their comments might get jumped on, newbies or timid tweeters may not shoot out a thought-provoking tweet. </p>
<p>I still don&#8217;t have a problem with &#8220;deep,&#8221; but we definitely agree that one size does not fit all. Great post, Dean.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Lee Kolberts last blog post..<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AGeekymommasBlog/~3/498649160/top-10-sitesapps-for-after-eggnog-is.html" rel="nofollow">Top 10 Sites/Apps For After The EggNog is Gone</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie S.</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-30908</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 20:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-30908</guid>
		<description>I find Plurk to be a better medium for conversation.  The threading allows for easier discussion, even with the similar 140 character limitation.  You can also ignore (mute) an entire conversation in Plurk in a way that is impossible with Twitter.  

I do understand your point about &quot;Twitter Deep&quot; but find it an interesting and fun exercise to condense my usual loquaciousness and verbosity into 140 characters.  

John Schinker made mention of your same observations about Twitter in a recent Taste of Tech post.  He references &quot;learning to properly use&quot; Twitter and talks about when Twitter can (and can&#039;t) be useful.  http://staff.bbhcsd.org/schinkerj/archives/2008/12/31/the-year-that-was/

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Debbie S.s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://12amusings.wordpress.com/2009/01/01/seven-in-nine/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Seven in Nine&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find Plurk to be a better medium for conversation.  The threading allows for easier discussion, even with the similar 140 character limitation.  You can also ignore (mute) an entire conversation in Plurk in a way that is impossible with Twitter.  </p>
<p>I do understand your point about &#8220;Twitter Deep&#8221; but find it an interesting and fun exercise to condense my usual loquaciousness and verbosity into 140 characters.  </p>
<p>John Schinker made mention of your same observations about Twitter in a recent Taste of Tech post.  He references &#8220;learning to properly use&#8221; Twitter and talks about when Twitter can (and can&#8217;t) be useful.  <a href="http://staff.bbhcsd.org/schinkerj/archives/2008/12/31/the-year-that-was/" rel="nofollow">http://staff.bbhcsd.org/schinkerj/archives/2008/12/31/the-year-that-was/</a></p>
<p><abbr><em>Debbie S.s last blog post..<a href="http://12amusings.wordpress.com/2009/01/01/seven-in-nine/" rel="nofollow">Seven in Nine</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Grey</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-30907</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Grey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 20:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-30907</guid>
		<description>Very intriguing post.  I absolutely agree that Twitter can only get you so deep in a conversation, but sometimes it&#039;s the only way to get that conversation started.  The discussion that began today would never have gone where it went had it not happened on Twitter.  Ryan Bretag and Jim O&#039;Hagan were light-heartedly talking about 21st Century Literacy and Skills.  A couple people started adding to the discussion, and before long, a very dynamic conversation was taking place with at least twelve different voices adding value to the conversation.  As you pointed out above, now there will be an Elluminate session tomorrow for anyone interested to discuss the topic.  The session wouldn&#039;t have happened had the event not percolated on Twitter.

I like what you said about eventually people need to &quot;get a room.&quot;  I&#039;ve had several occasions where I wished the discussion could have moved from Twitter and transferred to Skype or Elluminate or whatever the tool to allow for more open discussion.  Too often that doesn&#039;t happen.  So while I will disagree with you about these conversations not having a place on Twitter or the equivalent, I do agree with the idea that people should be more open to engage beyond when the discussion becomes ripe for dynamic dialogue.  I also think it&#039;s important to recognize that often it is because of a microblog that these conversations take place on as large a scale as they do.  I know for myself, if it weren&#039;t for Twitter, I likely never would have come to know who Dean Shareski is or the thought provoking conversations that take place here in this space.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Ben Greys last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://bengrey.com/blog/?p=63&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;21st Century Clarification&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very intriguing post.  I absolutely agree that Twitter can only get you so deep in a conversation, but sometimes it&#8217;s the only way to get that conversation started.  The discussion that began today would never have gone where it went had it not happened on Twitter.  Ryan Bretag and Jim O&#8217;Hagan were light-heartedly talking about 21st Century Literacy and Skills.  A couple people started adding to the discussion, and before long, a very dynamic conversation was taking place with at least twelve different voices adding value to the conversation.  As you pointed out above, now there will be an Elluminate session tomorrow for anyone interested to discuss the topic.  The session wouldn&#8217;t have happened had the event not percolated on Twitter.</p>
<p>I like what you said about eventually people need to &#8220;get a room.&#8221;  I&#8217;ve had several occasions where I wished the discussion could have moved from Twitter and transferred to Skype or Elluminate or whatever the tool to allow for more open discussion.  Too often that doesn&#8217;t happen.  So while I will disagree with you about these conversations not having a place on Twitter or the equivalent, I do agree with the idea that people should be more open to engage beyond when the discussion becomes ripe for dynamic dialogue.  I also think it&#8217;s important to recognize that often it is because of a microblog that these conversations take place on as large a scale as they do.  I know for myself, if it weren&#8217;t for Twitter, I likely never would have come to know who Dean Shareski is or the thought provoking conversations that take place here in this space.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Ben Greys last blog post..<a href="http://bengrey.com/blog/?p=63" rel="nofollow">21st Century Clarification</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna DesRoches</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-30906</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna DesRoches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 20:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-30906</guid>
		<description>Dean - I love the mini conversations that spring up on Twitter but agree that they don&#039;t always lend themselves to the depth of thought that occurs within a blog conversation.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Donna DesRochess last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://classroomtechtips.wordpress.com/2009/01/01/7-things-meme/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;7 things meme&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dean &#8211; I love the mini conversations that spring up on Twitter but agree that they don&#8217;t always lend themselves to the depth of thought that occurs within a blog conversation.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Donna DesRochess last blog post..<a href="http://classroomtechtips.wordpress.com/2009/01/01/7-things-meme/" rel="nofollow">7 things meme</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Shareski</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-30905</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Shareski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 20:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-30905</guid>
		<description>Lee,

I suppose the real clarification needs to be around the term &quot;deep&quot;. I have had a few occasions where a short back and forth exchange on twitter is helpful and I suppose people can lurk and gain some insights. I guess I wrote this because I&#039;ve just seen too many really important conversations go sour and certainly become frustrating as people try to cram their ideas in a space that&#039;s just too restrictive. 

You mention taking things to twitter because of numbers. I agree that in some cases that&#039;s of benefit. If you&#039;re doing a quick poll, want some suggestions and so forth. The kind of conversations I&#039;m talking about require more depth and are often laden with controversy.  

In that respect, you make my point that one size does not fit all. I hope I don&#039;t discourage folks from engaging but hopefully do the opposite. I wonder how many don&#039;t chime in because they know they can&#039;t articulate their ideas in 140 characters and so they simply observe? That&#039;s not necessarily a bad thing but people new to social media need to know they are other ways to engage and resolve the restrictive nature of any tool. Small pieces loosely joined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee,</p>
<p>I suppose the real clarification needs to be around the term &#8220;deep&#8221;. I have had a few occasions where a short back and forth exchange on twitter is helpful and I suppose people can lurk and gain some insights. I guess I wrote this because I&#8217;ve just seen too many really important conversations go sour and certainly become frustrating as people try to cram their ideas in a space that&#8217;s just too restrictive. </p>
<p>You mention taking things to twitter because of numbers. I agree that in some cases that&#8217;s of benefit. If you&#8217;re doing a quick poll, want some suggestions and so forth. The kind of conversations I&#8217;m talking about require more depth and are often laden with controversy.  </p>
<p>In that respect, you make my point that one size does not fit all. I hope I don&#8217;t discourage folks from engaging but hopefully do the opposite. I wonder how many don&#8217;t chime in because they know they can&#8217;t articulate their ideas in 140 characters and so they simply observe? That&#8217;s not necessarily a bad thing but people new to social media need to know they are other ways to engage and resolve the restrictive nature of any tool. Small pieces loosely joined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-30904</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 20:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-30904</guid>
		<description>Well said! Like all things there are exceptions but twitter is not focused even in the way a forum is and so for my part I find it to be a portal to connections , blog posts and 140 character updates. I found some great blogs through twitter and I have a sense of connectedness with others ( especially right after the fire) but it is just a place to jump in not a place to have deep conversations. 
Interestingly one of the places I have found twitter most useful is at NECC and other conventions when it keeps me alerted to noteworthy sessions and gives instant feedback and conversation on whats going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said! Like all things there are exceptions but twitter is not focused even in the way a forum is and so for my part I find it to be a portal to connections , blog posts and 140 character updates. I found some great blogs through twitter and I have a sense of connectedness with others ( especially right after the fire) but it is just a place to jump in not a place to have deep conversations.<br />
Interestingly one of the places I have found twitter most useful is at NECC and other conventions when it keeps me alerted to noteworthy sessions and gives instant feedback and conversation on whats going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela Maiers</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-30903</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela Maiers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 20:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-30903</guid>
		<description>Dean
I love the analogy! You make some great points. These extended Twitter debates are becoming more and more common, and I have found myself going back through archives trying to re-sect the conversation while along the way losing a whole lot of necessary context to draw any reasonable conclusion about the point being made. I find myself watching from the sidelines rather than engaging or contributing to a deeper conversation. 

There is nothing that beats Twitter for igniting the dialogue, but there has to be a more productive venue for taking the conversation to other levels. As always, thanks for stretching my thinking! Happy New Year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dean<br />
I love the analogy! You make some great points. These extended Twitter debates are becoming more and more common, and I have found myself going back through archives trying to re-sect the conversation while along the way losing a whole lot of necessary context to draw any reasonable conclusion about the point being made. I find myself watching from the sidelines rather than engaging or contributing to a deeper conversation. </p>
<p>There is nothing that beats Twitter for igniting the dialogue, but there has to be a more productive venue for taking the conversation to other levels. As always, thanks for stretching my thinking! Happy New Year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Shepherd</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-30902</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Shepherd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 20:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-30902</guid>
		<description>This is a good point. I have been using twitter for a few months now and my concern is that it feels like a global chat room only at times. This is okay, but in order to totally expand on ideas and get the big idea it is important to stretch our reaches into blogging. For ourselves, the writer, as well as the reader.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Ed Shepherds last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LearningToCollaborate/~3/499785878/7-things-you-dont-really-need-to-know.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;7 Things You Don&#039;t Really Need to Know About Me&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good point. I have been using twitter for a few months now and my concern is that it feels like a global chat room only at times. This is okay, but in order to totally expand on ideas and get the big idea it is important to stretch our reaches into blogging. For ourselves, the writer, as well as the reader.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Ed Shepherds last blog post..<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LearningToCollaborate/~3/499785878/7-things-you-dont-really-need-to-know.html" rel="nofollow">7 Things You Don&#8217;t Really Need to Know About Me</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Kolbert</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-30901</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Kolbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 20:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-30901</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know, Dean. I agree that 140 characters is limiting, however sometimes these are important/engaging/fun conversations and for some of us these may be our only opportunities to have them with a global group. Although only 2 or 3 people conversed in your example, because it was public others had the opportunity to add their 140 cents or simply lurk and learn. Posting to my blog may be a great way to take it deeper but will not always generate a conversation. Additionally, my readership doesn&#039;t lend itself to reaching the very people I might reach via Twitter. It doesn&#039;t necessarily pull the same people who read my tweets or my @replies. Through Twitter I can reach out to @anyone. Using Twitter or Plurk for this type of &quot;chat room&quot; discussion may not be the most efficient venue, but it does allow others to jump in where if it were moved to the privacy of an offsite room, that opportunity is removed. 

Although I think I can confidently say that it is not your intent, I fear that posts like this will discourage people who may not otherwise engage.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Lee Kolberts last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Er/AGeekymommasBlog/%7E3/498649160/top-10-sitesapps-for-after-eggnog-is.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Top 10 Sites/Apps For After The EggNog is Gone&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know, Dean. I agree that 140 characters is limiting, however sometimes these are important/engaging/fun conversations and for some of us these may be our only opportunities to have them with a global group. Although only 2 or 3 people conversed in your example, because it was public others had the opportunity to add their 140 cents or simply lurk and learn. Posting to my blog may be a great way to take it deeper but will not always generate a conversation. Additionally, my readership doesn&#8217;t lend itself to reaching the very people I might reach via Twitter. It doesn&#8217;t necessarily pull the same people who read my tweets or my @replies. Through Twitter I can reach out to @anyone. Using Twitter or Plurk for this type of &#8220;chat room&#8221; discussion may not be the most efficient venue, but it does allow others to jump in where if it were moved to the privacy of an offsite room, that opportunity is removed. </p>
<p>Although I think I can confidently say that it is not your intent, I fear that posts like this will discourage people who may not otherwise engage.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Lee Kolberts last blog post..<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Er/AGeekymommasBlog/%7E3/498649160/top-10-sitesapps-for-after-eggnog-is.html" rel="nofollow">Top 10 Sites/Apps For After The EggNog is Gone</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie Carr</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-30900</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Carr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 20:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-30900</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in agreement. I have been using Twitter for about a month now. When there was a conversation that would need to take longer than a tweet would allow, it had to be done in another way (i.e. email). This would mean an exchange of addresses and the little bit of trust that goes with that. Email is not always the best option. Using Twitter has lead me to want to go further in the workings of a digital network. Today was my first attempt posting to my own blog. It&#039;s amazing that in the hours since I&#039;ve posted to my blog I&#039;ve received two comments on the blog and three tweets about it. A smile did cross my face as I read the comments. It is satisfying to go further into that digital world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in agreement. I have been using Twitter for about a month now. When there was a conversation that would need to take longer than a tweet would allow, it had to be done in another way (i.e. email). This would mean an exchange of addresses and the little bit of trust that goes with that. Email is not always the best option. Using Twitter has lead me to want to go further in the workings of a digital network. Today was my first attempt posting to my own blog. It&#8217;s amazing that in the hours since I&#8217;ve posted to my blog I&#8217;ve received two comments on the blog and three tweets about it. A smile did cross my face as I read the comments. It is satisfying to go further into that digital world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dougpete</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/comment-page-1/#comment-30899</link>
		<dc:creator>dougpete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 19:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2009/01/01/twitter-deep-vs-blog-deep/#comment-30899</guid>
		<description>Excellent entry, Dean.  This should give people pause to think about things and realize that there isn&#039;t just one tool.  Choose the most appropriate one in context of the subject.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;dougpetes last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://dougpete.wordpress.com/2009/01/01/into-2009/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Into 2009&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent entry, Dean.  This should give people pause to think about things and realize that there isn&#8217;t just one tool.  Choose the most appropriate one in context of the subject.</p>
<p><abbr><em>dougpetes last blog post..<a href="http://dougpete.wordpress.com/2009/01/01/into-2009/" rel="nofollow">Into 2009</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
