<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m telling you for the last time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ideasandthoughts.org/2008/02/24/im-telling-you-for-the-last-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2008/02/24/im-telling-you-for-the-last-time/</link>
	<description>As an educational technologist, I am exploring ways to make learning more relevant, engaging and authentic.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Open Resource Centre : Online safety - the latest</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2008/02/24/im-telling-you-for-the-last-time/#comment-29625</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Resource Centre : Online safety - the latest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 19:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2008/02/24/im-telling-you-for-the-last-time/#comment-29625</guid>
		<description>[...] victims of Internet-initiated sex crimes were 13 to 17 years old&#8230;none were younger than 12 *why include this point?Posting personal information online does not, by itself, appear to be a particularly risky [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] victims of Internet-initiated sex crimes were 13 to 17 years old&hellip;none were younger than 12 *why include this point?Posting personal information online does not, by itself, appear to be a particularly risky [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ideas and Thoughts from an EdTech &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Beatrice, you&#8217;re way off!</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2008/02/24/im-telling-you-for-the-last-time/#comment-29171</link>
		<dc:creator>Ideas and Thoughts from an EdTech &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Beatrice, you&#8217;re way off!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2008/02/24/im-telling-you-for-the-last-time/#comment-29171</guid>
		<description>[...] I don&#8217;t just ignore stories like this but feel compelled to speak out. Even the reporter lacked the background information to challenge her claim. I&#8217;ve written about this too often to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I don&#8217;t just ignore stories like this but feel compelled to speak out. Even the reporter lacked the background information to challenge her claim. I&#8217;ve written about this too often to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Shareski</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2008/02/24/im-telling-you-for-the-last-time/#comment-28943</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Shareski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 05:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2008/02/24/im-telling-you-for-the-last-time/#comment-28943</guid>
		<description>Tanya,

I apologize if I offended you because that wasn't my intent.  If there was a single incident that triggered this post, it was from a participant who muttered a comment about predators in a very smug way. I don't recall our specific discussion but certainly I don't mean to say it wasn't valid. 

My frustrations comes in that it continues to be the very first question.  It's not that I feel that everyone should be aware but am frustrated by those that are quick to believe false and hyped media reports instead of asking thoughtful questions. 

My blog does offer the occasional rant and while it's not my intend to offend, it is my intent to "stir the pot". That said, I appreciate your pushing me on my approach and I certainly will take into consideration your thoughts. I'm glad you posted as this is the purpose of the blog, not simply to agree with me but to help me learn. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tanya,</p>
<p>I apologize if I offended you because that wasn&#8217;t my intent.  If there was a single incident that triggered this post, it was from a participant who muttered a comment about predators in a very smug way. I don&#8217;t recall our specific discussion but certainly I don&#8217;t mean to say it wasn&#8217;t valid. </p>
<p>My frustrations comes in that it continues to be the very first question.  It&#8217;s not that I feel that everyone should be aware but am frustrated by those that are quick to believe false and hyped media reports instead of asking thoughtful questions. </p>
<p>My blog does offer the occasional rant and while it&#8217;s not my intend to offend, it is my intent to &#8220;stir the pot&#8221;. That said, I appreciate your pushing me on my approach and I certainly will take into consideration your thoughts. I&#8217;m glad you posted as this is the purpose of the blog, not simply to agree with me but to help me learn. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tanya</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2008/02/24/im-telling-you-for-the-last-time/#comment-28942</link>
		<dc:creator>tanya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 05:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2008/02/24/im-telling-you-for-the-last-time/#comment-28942</guid>
		<description>There is a post that "I felt went over the top in terms of etiquette and manners", titled; I'm telling you for the last time". I believe that you were referring to the question that I asked at Showcase (although the quote that you included in your post was not completely accurate). It was not my intent to "bring an important conversation about learning to a grinding halt". I was actually hoping to get information (from someone that I respect and trust) to use when I am questioned for using photos (of my own children) online. I am on your side. Your post made it seem like I was the enemy, against all things good only after posing what I still believe was a fair question. I was very offended by the title of your post - "I'm telling you for the last time". It implies that this is information that everyone should know &#38; that it is a complete waste of your time to have to discuss it yet again. I have only been on my Web 2.0 learning journey for the past year. I have completed the "Meet the Stars" online course and I have subscribed to your blog for the past year. I am not an idiot (although I did feel like one after reading your rant). I am far behind you in terms of Web 2.0 learning, however I am leaps &#38; bounds ahead of many other educators. If you are indeed "frustrated with the lack of knowledge that folks have about this issue", I would hope that you would use the fantastic opportunity that you have (via your presentations &#38; via this blog) to teach not chastise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a post that &#8220;I felt went over the top in terms of etiquette and manners&#8221;, titled; I&#8217;m telling you for the last time&#8221;. I believe that you were referring to the question that I asked at Showcase (although the quote that you included in your post was not completely accurate). It was not my intent to &#8220;bring an important conversation about learning to a grinding halt&#8221;. I was actually hoping to get information (from someone that I respect and trust) to use when I am questioned for using photos (of my own children) online. I am on your side. Your post made it seem like I was the enemy, against all things good only after posing what I still believe was a fair question. I was very offended by the title of your post - &#8220;I&#8217;m telling you for the last time&#8221;. It implies that this is information that everyone should know &amp; that it is a complete waste of your time to have to discuss it yet again. I have only been on my Web 2.0 learning journey for the past year. I have completed the &#8220;Meet the Stars&#8221; online course and I have subscribed to your blog for the past year. I am not an idiot (although I did feel like one after reading your rant). I am far behind you in terms of Web 2.0 learning, however I am leaps &amp; bounds ahead of many other educators. If you are indeed &#8220;frustrated with the lack of knowledge that folks have about this issue&#8221;, I would hope that you would use the fantastic opportunity that you have (via your presentations &amp; via this blog) to teach not chastise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conversation On Al Upton Situation With Alec Couros&#8217;s EC&#38;I 831 Class &#124; Mobile Technology in TAFE</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2008/02/24/im-telling-you-for-the-last-time/#comment-28914</link>
		<dc:creator>Conversation On Al Upton Situation With Alec Couros&#8217;s EC&#38;I 831 Class &#124; Mobile Technology in TAFE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 07:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2008/02/24/im-telling-you-for-the-last-time/#comment-28914</guid>
		<description>[...] educating, educating &#8212; not denying. Rob Wall suggested we check out Dean Shareski&#8217;s I’m telling you for the last time post which discusses key sections from the APA Press [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] educating, educating &#8212; not denying. Rob Wall suggested we check out Dean Shareski&#8217;s I’m telling you for the last time post which discusses key sections from the APA Press [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
