<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News Feed Zero</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ideasandthoughts.org/2007/08/24/news-feed-zero/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2007/08/24/news-feed-zero/</link>
	<description>As an educational technologist, I am exploring ways to make learning more relevant, engaging and authentic.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2007/08/24/news-feed-zero/#comment-27474</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 01:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2007/08/24/news-feed-zero/#comment-27474</guid>
		<description>I couldn't understand some parts of this article News Feed Zero, but I guess I just need to check some more resources regarding this, because it sounds interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t understand some parts of this article News Feed Zero, but I guess I just need to check some more resources regarding this, because it sounds interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Shareski</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2007/08/24/news-feed-zero/#comment-27316</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Shareski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 21:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2007/08/24/news-feed-zero/#comment-27316</guid>
		<description>Ewan, 
In the interest of privacy I'll not confirm your suggestion.  (Who savors 71 posts anyway?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ewan,<br />
In the interest of privacy I&#8217;ll not confirm your suggestion.  (Who savors 71 posts anyway?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewan McIntosh</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2007/08/24/news-feed-zero/#comment-27305</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewan McIntosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 07:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2007/08/24/news-feed-zero/#comment-27305</guid>
		<description>Was it a day quite recently when there were SEVENTY ONE unread posts from a vociferous Scot? ;-) I believed him when he said he wanted time to savour them. Maybe I shouldn't have... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was it a day quite recently when there were SEVENTY ONE unread posts from a vociferous Scot? <img src='http://ideasandthoughts.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> I believed him when he said he wanted time to savour them. Maybe I shouldn&#8217;t have&#8230; <img src='http://ideasandthoughts.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan Golding</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2007/08/24/news-feed-zero/#comment-27281</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan Golding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 21:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2007/08/24/news-feed-zero/#comment-27281</guid>
		<description>Interesting connection between the inbox and news reader. I've been a huge fan of Merlin Mann and his inbox zero movement since reading Getting Things Done by David Allen.

Two thoughts come to mind regarding taming the news reader beast:

1) Apply the two-minute rule. If you can take action (read and react) on it in under 2 minutes, then do so. If not, then make an action out of it. No matter what, though, you may not leave it unread and in your inbox. There are plenty of long blog posts that I want to return to when I have the time. I've been using Google Reader's "Star" feature for these posts. It doesn't work 100% but is similar to my inbox zero approach.

2) Don't handle things more than once. In the GTD world, that means papers in your meat space inbox should be picked up and a disposition given. You're not supposed to put stuff back into the inbox. In the news reader version, I think that means you have to read the article, star it, share it, or whatever -- but not leave it there (like the blogger WR did in your retelling).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting connection between the inbox and news reader. I&#8217;ve been a huge fan of Merlin Mann and his inbox zero movement since reading Getting Things Done by David Allen.</p>
<p>Two thoughts come to mind regarding taming the news reader beast:</p>
<p>1) Apply the two-minute rule. If you can take action (read and react) on it in under 2 minutes, then do so. If not, then make an action out of it. No matter what, though, you may not leave it unread and in your inbox. There are plenty of long blog posts that I want to return to when I have the time. I&#8217;ve been using Google Reader&#8217;s &#8220;Star&#8221; feature for these posts. It doesn&#8217;t work 100% but is similar to my inbox zero approach.</p>
<p>2) Don&#8217;t handle things more than once. In the GTD world, that means papers in your meat space inbox should be picked up and a disposition given. You&#8217;re not supposed to put stuff back into the inbox. In the news reader version, I think that means you have to read the article, star it, share it, or whatever &#8212; but not leave it there (like the blogger WR did in your retelling).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane Hammond</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2007/08/24/news-feed-zero/#comment-27279</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Hammond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 16:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2007/08/24/news-feed-zero/#comment-27279</guid>
		<description>Iagree with you about the importance of our aggregators!

I would add to your responses two more that I find to be very effective.

1. I use Google Reader so I have the ability to tag posts. So even though I may just skim the post initially, I tag it if it is relevant to a topic that I'm interested in. Then when I need it, I can quickly call up the post.
2. I drop and add feeds on a regular basis based on shared interests. Sometimes a blogger will dig deeply into a topic in which I have little interest, so I'll drop that feed for a while and then pick it up again at a later date when our interests converge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iagree with you about the importance of our aggregators!</p>
<p>I would add to your responses two more that I find to be very effective.</p>
<p>1. I use Google Reader so I have the ability to tag posts. So even though I may just skim the post initially, I tag it if it is relevant to a topic that I&#8217;m interested in. Then when I need it, I can quickly call up the post.<br />
2. I drop and add feeds on a regular basis based on shared interests. Sometimes a blogger will dig deeply into a topic in which I have little interest, so I&#8217;ll drop that feed for a while and then pick it up again at a later date when our interests converge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
