<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: He didn&#8217;t get it 1997 and he doesn&#8217;t get it now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ideasandthoughts.org/2007/02/22/he-didnt-get-it-1997-and-he-doesnt-get-it-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2007/02/22/he-didnt-get-it-1997-and-he-doesnt-get-it-now/</link>
	<description>Learning stuff since 1964</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 00:27:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Shareski</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2007/02/22/he-didnt-get-it-1997-and-he-doesnt-get-it-now/comment-page-1/#comment-19202</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Shareski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 18:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2007/02/22/he-didnt-get-it-1997-and-he-doesnt-get-it-now/#comment-19202</guid>
		<description>While forgiveness might be good advice for Fuzzy, to me it&#039;s more about allowing the truth to surface. Wikipedia is known for its neutrality and community effort to provide facts. Eventually these errors were fixed. I think it&#039;s very difficult to get away with malicious statements over the long haul. Wikipedia, from my perspective has proven itself to be very credible when given time. 
When a rumor is floating around and it&#039;s finally made public, the truth is usually revealed. Not always, but the public nature of wikipedia and it philosophy of neutrality works pretty well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While forgiveness might be good advice for Fuzzy, to me it&#8217;s more about allowing the truth to surface. Wikipedia is known for its neutrality and community effort to provide facts. Eventually these errors were fixed. I think it&#8217;s very difficult to get away with malicious statements over the long haul. Wikipedia, from my perspective has proven itself to be very credible when given time.<br />
When a rumor is floating around and it&#8217;s finally made public, the truth is usually revealed. Not always, but the public nature of wikipedia and it philosophy of neutrality works pretty well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Turner</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2007/02/22/he-didnt-get-it-1997-and-he-doesnt-get-it-now/comment-page-1/#comment-19132</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/2007/02/22/he-didnt-get-it-1997-and-he-doesnt-get-it-now/#comment-19132</guid>
		<description>Well Said!  Had a preacher do a sermon on forgiveness and forgetting. I think it&#039;s time that maybe Fuzzy did a little bit of this as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Said!  Had a preacher do a sermon on forgiveness and forgetting. I think it&#8217;s time that maybe Fuzzy did a little bit of this as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

