Comments on: Determining Truth and Loose Change http://ideasandthoughts.org/2006/08/19/determining-truth-and-loose-change/ I'm here to learn, join me Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:16:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Reg http://ideasandthoughts.org/2006/08/19/determining-truth-and-loose-change/comment-page-1/#comment-5234 Reg Sun, 10 Sep 2006 04:45:27 +0000 http://ideasandthoughts.org/2006/08/19/determining-truth-and-loose-change/#comment-5234 Loose Change - now in its second edition, is the work of two young college students. The questions raised are vital and the research only slightly flawed. To suggest that this is the most credible source of 'truth' to investigate is a bit naive, and denies the mountain of supportive evidence unearthed by many other engineers, scientists and professional researchers....a far greater source of 'truth.' The bottom line is that there has been NO investigation that has attempted to answer any of the questions that come from those who have raised reasonable suspicion... not conspiracy tin hat wearers. (the Kean Commmissin was a sad joke) Until that happens, there will be no answers...only people searching the Internet for substantive corroboration of their own theories. Loose Change 2 is an eye opener...but Scholars For 9/11 Truth and other far more credible sources are being totally ignored by the mainstream media. No one is willing to even interview these academicians and professional researchers. The subject is taboo. I do commend you for encouraging your students to have an open mind. But, until there is open dialog about the anomalies and distortions in the official version of what happened on Sept. 11, 2001, all else is a meaniningless search for an evasive truth. I'd like your students to read one of our most compelling editorials on this topic....and explore the links we provide: 9/11 – US Complicity: Implausible, or Very Probable? Questions for the People Who Believe the Official Conspiracy Theory <a href="http://tvnewslies.org/html/9_11_-_us_complicity__implausi.html" rel="nofollow">CLICK HERE</a> http://tvnewslies.org/html/9_11_-_us_complicity__implausi.html Loose Change – now in its second edition, is the work of two young college students. The questions raised are vital and the research only slightly flawed. To suggest that this is the most credible source of ‘truth’ to investigate is a bit naive, and denies the mountain of supportive evidence unearthed by many other engineers, scientists and professional researchers….a far greater source of ‘truth.’

The bottom line is that there has been NO investigation that has attempted to answer any of the questions that come from those who have raised reasonable suspicion… not conspiracy tin hat wearers. (the Kean Commmissin was a sad joke) Until that happens, there will be no answers…only people searching the Internet for substantive corroboration of their own theories.

Loose Change 2 is an eye opener…but Scholars For 9/11 Truth and other far more credible sources are being totally ignored by the mainstream media. No one is willing to even interview these academicians and professional researchers. The subject is taboo.

I do commend you for encouraging your students to have an open mind. But, until there is open dialog about the anomalies and distortions in the official version of what happened on Sept. 11, 2001, all else is a meaniningless search for an evasive truth.

I’d like your students to read one of our most compelling editorials on this topic….and explore the links we provide:

9/11 – US Complicity: Implausible, or Very Probable?
Questions for the People Who Believe the Official Conspiracy Theory

CLICK HERE

http://tvnewslies.org/html/9_11_-_us_complicity__implausi.html

]]> By: shareski http://ideasandthoughts.org/2006/08/19/determining-truth-and-loose-change/comment-page-1/#comment-3957 shareski Sat, 19 Aug 2006 20:55:43 +0000 http://ideasandthoughts.org/2006/08/19/determining-truth-and-loose-change/#comment-3957 I love the passion of the anti-conspiracy folks who comment. Not sure whether to think of it as spam or not. My point was not to incite the discussion about 9/11 rather the idea of discovering truth via many sources and allowing students to make thoughtful decisions. I love the passion of the anti-conspiracy folks who comment. Not sure whether to think of it as spam or not.

My point was not to incite the discussion about 9/11 rather the idea of discovering truth via many sources and allowing students to make thoughtful decisions.

]]> By: Nico Haupt aka ewing2001 http://ideasandthoughts.org/2006/08/19/determining-truth-and-loose-change/comment-page-1/#comment-3953 Nico Haupt aka ewing2001 Sat, 19 Aug 2006 18:12:37 +0000 http://ideasandthoughts.org/2006/08/19/determining-truth-and-loose-change/#comment-3953 Loose Change, Kevin Barrett and the 9/11 Scholars are only covering half of the truth, which turns it into a limited hangout. Same to the Vanity Fair-NORAD negligence hangout. The rest is documented here: http://911tvfakery.blogspot.com http://911tvfakery.net If anyone agrees please sign the following petition at: http://www.petitiononline.com/911tvfak/petition.html Loose Change, Kevin Barrett and the 9/11 Scholars are only covering half of the truth, which turns it into a limited hangout.
Same to the Vanity Fair-NORAD negligence hangout.

The rest is documented here:
http://911tvfakery.blogspot.com
http://911tvfakery.net

If anyone agrees please sign the following petition at:
http://www.petitiononline.com/911tvfak/petition.html

]]> By: Brainster http://ideasandthoughts.org/2006/08/19/determining-truth-and-loose-change/comment-page-1/#comment-3952 Brainster Sat, 19 Aug 2006 16:56:26 +0000 http://ideasandthoughts.org/2006/08/19/determining-truth-and-loose-change/#comment-3952 Look around for the video Screw Loose Change (listed on that same Wikipedia page); that presents the original video with an overlay of the real truth. Also look around for "9-11 Deniers Speak" if you want to hear what the Loose Change director really thinks of the people we lost on September 11, 2001. Look around for the video Screw Loose Change (listed on that same Wikipedia page); that presents the original video with an overlay of the real truth. Also look around for “9-11 Deniers Speak” if you want to hear what the Loose Change director really thinks of the people we lost on September 11, 2001.

]]>