Comments on: Are Wikis Worth the Time? http://ideasandthoughts.org/2005/12/19/are-wikis-worth-the-time/ Learning stuff since 1964 Sat, 12 May 2012 00:27:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Wikipedia continues to be the poster child for Shifted Learning | Ideas and Thoughts http://ideasandthoughts.org/2005/12/19/are-wikis-worth-the-time/comment-page-1/#comment-45564 Wikipedia continues to be the poster child for Shifted Learning | Ideas and Thoughts Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:31:15 +0000 http://ideasandthoughts.org/?p=163#comment-45564 [...] best single example continues to be wikipedia. I’ll argue every and twice on Sundays for the value of wikipedia. Scot McLeod pointed me to this and Will Richardson via his del.icio.us account led me to this [...] [...] best single example continues to be wikipedia. I’ll argue every and twice on Sundays for the value of wikipedia. Scot McLeod pointed me to this and Will Richardson via his del.icio.us account led me to this [...]

]]> By: Miguel Guhlin http://ideasandthoughts.org/2005/12/19/are-wikis-worth-the-time/comment-page-1/#comment-174 Miguel Guhlin Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:26:00 +0000 http://ideasandthoughts.org/?p=163#comment-174 Nice job, Dean! You made the points well. What librarians fail to realize is that there can be no critical audience that a world of producers. As more consumers become producers, the level of analysis will increase. When Britannica made a mistake, most of us were ignorant and helpless to do anything short of writing the company. Those errors occurred in isolation and were only revealed by the company if they had integrity (assume they did). Now, anyone can be critical and we ALL know the errors...and that's the point of open source. As more of the community become involved, the more of us take responsibility for producing accurate information, the better off the end product will be. I often think, perhaps unfairly, that librarians have had their cheese moved in a big way...and they are having trouble handling it. It's all changed so quickly...in the space of a year or less, although it's been building for a lot longer, than if they weren't pushing information literacy and problem-solving before, they're now obsolete. Attrition, retirement...who said education wasn't high stakes? Nice job, Dean! You made the points well. What librarians fail to realize is that there can be no critical audience that a world of producers. As more consumers become producers, the level of analysis will increase. When Britannica made a mistake, most of us were ignorant and helpless to do anything short of writing the company. Those errors occurred in isolation and were only revealed by the company if they had integrity (assume they did).

Now, anyone can be critical and we ALL know the errors…and that’s the point of open source. As more of the community become involved, the more of us take responsibility for producing accurate information, the better off the end product will be.

I often think, perhaps unfairly, that librarians have had their cheese moved in a big way…and they are having trouble handling it. It’s all changed so quickly…in the space of a year or less, although it’s been building for a lot longer, than if they weren’t pushing information literacy and problem-solving before, they’re now obsolete.

Attrition, retirement…who said education wasn’t high stakes?

]]>