<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Wikis Worth the Time?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ideasandthoughts.org/2005/12/19/are-wikis-worth-the-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2005/12/19/are-wikis-worth-the-time/</link>
	<description>As an educational technologist, I am exploring ways to make learning more relevant, engaging and authentic.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 10:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Miguel Guhlin</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2005/12/19/are-wikis-worth-the-time/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel Guhlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/?p=163#comment-174</guid>
		<description>Nice job, Dean! You made the points well. What librarians fail to realize is that there can be no critical audience that a world of producers. As more consumers become producers, the level of analysis will increase. When Britannica made a mistake, most of us were ignorant and helpless to do anything short of writing the company. Those errors occurred in isolation and were only revealed by the company if they had integrity (assume they did).

Now, anyone can be critical and we ALL know the errors...and that's the point of open source. As more of the community become involved, the more of us take responsibility for producing accurate information, the better off the end product will be.

I often think, perhaps unfairly, that librarians have had their cheese moved in a big way...and they are having trouble handling it. It's all changed so quickly...in the space of a year or less, although it's been building for a lot longer, than if they weren't pushing information literacy and problem-solving before, they're now obsolete.

Attrition, retirement...who said education wasn't high stakes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice job, Dean! You made the points well. What librarians fail to realize is that there can be no critical audience that a world of producers. As more consumers become producers, the level of analysis will increase. When Britannica made a mistake, most of us were ignorant and helpless to do anything short of writing the company. Those errors occurred in isolation and were only revealed by the company if they had integrity (assume they did).</p>
<p>Now, anyone can be critical and we ALL know the errors&#8230;and that&#8217;s the point of open source. As more of the community become involved, the more of us take responsibility for producing accurate information, the better off the end product will be.</p>
<p>I often think, perhaps unfairly, that librarians have had their cheese moved in a big way&#8230;and they are having trouble handling it. It&#8217;s all changed so quickly&#8230;in the space of a year or less, although it&#8217;s been building for a lot longer, than if they weren&#8217;t pushing information literacy and problem-solving before, they&#8217;re now obsolete.</p>
<p>Attrition, retirement&#8230;who said education wasn&#8217;t high stakes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
