<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Videoblogging&#8230;still don&#8217;t get it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ideasandthoughts.org/2005/11/12/videobloggingstill-dont-get-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2005/11/12/videobloggingstill-dont-get-it/</link>
	<description>Learning stuff since 1964</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:09:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe McLaughlin</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2005/11/12/videobloggingstill-dont-get-it/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe McLaughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/?p=139#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Interesting point about the video blogging. I agree that video blogging, although kinda cool, won&#039;t go mainstream until the tools get better.

Podcasting has proliferated so fast primarily because of its ease of use. In order for any technology to take off and do well, it has to be easy to use as well as offer geater benefits than the traditional means.

There needs to be better tools that are easy to use that will allow the development of high quality video. These tools could be in the form of better software to better suit the video author&#039;s needs. Voice over automation would help as well. The most important tool would be better portablility of video from the actual video camera to the computer. Once this bridge is gapped video blogging might well proliferate across the web like podcasting has across America.

&lt;B&gt;P.S.&lt;/B&gt; As far as I know Quicktime doesn&#039;t have an &quot;Always on top&quot; feature. &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.winamp.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Winamp&lt;/A&gt; has this feature, but not all video formats will play through Winamp. You may need to install the appropriate codecs on your computer to use certain video with Winamp.

Thanks,
&lt;a HREF=&quot;jmclaugh@it-ideas.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Joe McLaughlin&lt;/A&gt;
Vist my site at &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.it-ideas.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IT-Ideas.com&lt;/A&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting point about the video blogging. I agree that video blogging, although kinda cool, won&#8217;t go mainstream until the tools get better.</p>
<p>Podcasting has proliferated so fast primarily because of its ease of use. In order for any technology to take off and do well, it has to be easy to use as well as offer geater benefits than the traditional means.</p>
<p>There needs to be better tools that are easy to use that will allow the development of high quality video. These tools could be in the form of better software to better suit the video author&#8217;s needs. Voice over automation would help as well. The most important tool would be better portablility of video from the actual video camera to the computer. Once this bridge is gapped video blogging might well proliferate across the web like podcasting has across America.</p>
<p><b>P.S.</b> As far as I know Quicktime doesn&#8217;t have an &#8220;Always on top&#8221; feature. <a HREF="http://www.winamp.com" rel="nofollow">Winamp</a> has this feature, but not all video formats will play through Winamp. You may need to install the appropriate codecs on your computer to use certain video with Winamp.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
<a HREF="jmclaugh@it-ideas.com" rel="nofollow">Joe McLaughlin</a><br />
Vist my site at <a HREF="http://www.it-ideas.com" rel="nofollow">IT-Ideas.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Claude Bradley</title>
		<link>http://ideasandthoughts.org/2005/11/12/videobloggingstill-dont-get-it/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Claude Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideasandthoughts.org/?p=139#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Dean,
I agree that video blogging is a different animal and I have commented in a similar vein &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://drexel-coas-elearning.blogspot.com/2005/11/video-podcasting-caution.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/A&gt; 
It reminds me of the phone to videophone transition that never happened.  By the way, it looks like you have plenty of snow now - it reminds me of my winters in Sudbury...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dean,<br />
I agree that video blogging is a different animal and I have commented in a similar vein <a HREF="http://drexel-coas-elearning.blogspot.com/2005/11/video-podcasting-caution.html" rel="nofollow">here</a><br />
It reminds me of the phone to videophone transition that never happened.  By the way, it looks like you have plenty of snow now &#8211; it reminds me of my winters in Sudbury&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

