Ideas and Thoughts from an EdTech

It’s like wildfire. You start talking about blogs and pretty soon it’s everywhere. CTV news did a piece on last week and CBC radio did a piece on it as well. I still wish people would stop calling them online diaries but that’s another story.
I’ve had several teachers interested in using it as a class website and also to encourage writing and I have a suspision it will soon surpass traditional websites for classrooms.

The RSS deal is also gettting to become a big thing. I subscribe to 34 feeds thus far and obviously that will grow.

I haven’t quite been able to put my finger on why this is such a vastly different way to experience the web but it is. I’m sure folks with more understanding have already thought this one through.

I did a session today at our Teachers’ Convention called a few of my favourite things. It sounds a bit narcisstic which it may have been. I attended a similar session at FETC so I certainly borrowed the idea but included many of the tools that I’ve found very helpful over the past while. One of the tools I shared was Microsoft’s Mappoint site. I think it’s an excellent site for finding directions and general mapping. Google has released something called Google maps. It’s a much more interactive site but seems weak as far as Canadian maps are concerned.

Using Bloglines which is my RSS news reader, I was looking at Rick Schwier’s blog and he mentioned Google maps. In one of his comments Alec Couros pointed out a site called Map24. I check it out and he’s right, it’s very good and extremely interactive. I encourage you to have a look.

Being able to tap into the research, thoughts and ideas of others makes you understand the power of blogs and RSS.

Our school techs will banter with each other about these catch phrases. Anytime they introduce new technologies, these words will evidently come into the conversation. It’s becoming an inside joke.

I watch the movie Cellular last night.

Fast paced, energetic and thought provoking as it related to technology. I enjoyed the special feature which dealt with many of the questions around the history of cell phones as well as the future. The piece ended with a prediction of one of the experts that we will have embedded chips under our skin and will simply have to think of someone and the chip will dial their number.

I don’t know if that’s where things are headed but it’s becoming more and more clear that the cell phone is quickly become the most prevalent technology we have. This certainly will raise and has already raised some interesting questions for schools.

My take is we need to accept this technology is here to stay and we’d better figure out how we can use it like any other tool to learn. It was mentioned in the special feature that cell phone makers really had no idea what young people would use them for and have since responed to their desires on using them. Cameras, text messaging, web browsing have all been uses that were never intended originally.

I’d like to think that technology is value free but that’s perhaps a bit naive. I do however feel that we as educators are in a very influential position in helping students learn to use the technology in the most effective ways.

I give Cellular a thumbs up.

ps. I don’t own a cell phone.

The learning that takes place with people you’ve never met is quite a unique experience. Currently I’m enrolled in a graduate class from Athabasca University. The course is called Human Factors in Distance Education. It’s project based which I prefer but it’s unusual in that most of the students are not educators. We’re developing a website on the Freedom of Information and Privacy Protection. Learning from non-teachers is valuable.

Will Richardson wrote recently about his thoughts on blogging and the online community. Everyone can potentially be an authority. This can be dangerous but it also opens up great possibilities.

Another great example of the need for teachers to be experts of information literacy not technology.

I heard Alfie Kohn speak this morning. He raised some interesting issues regarding grading and teaching in general. His basic premise is that extrinsic rewards are in direct conflict with intrinsic rewards and thus students will work towards a grade rather than towards learning and the love of it. If our collective long term goal for our students are to help them become critical thinkers, caring citizens and lll’s (life long learners), is what were doing with kids now really going to achieve this?

He also talked specifically about the Saskatchewan situation. Commending our province on the one hand for being front runners in opposing the strong move towards standardized testing and “potato sorting” of students. He was also very critical of Saskatchewan’s Evergreen Curriculum stating that it’s objective heavy mandated approach limits teachers in discovering content because of the perceived need to cover content.

Very interesting stuff and things that I’ve been pondering for a while. His philosophy of education coincides well with two other speakers I’ve heard in the last 6 months. Willard Daggett and Ken O’Connor. Maybe we will see a change….

We all know the internet is a weird place. Here are two very odd sites that I came across recently.

One is called Nobody Here. I can’t really figure it out but it’s quite captivating. I’d like to know what others think about this one.

The other one I believe has some mathematical usefulness. I think it’s called Drawtoy but I’m not really sure. It allows you to build a kalediescope and apply all kings of effects.

Theses sites are courtesy of a previous post on Stumble upon.

How long before everyone has some type of wireless portable computer.

MIT is currently working on developing a laptop for under $100. The intent is to provide 3rd world countries with technology.

A High School in Arizona is replacing textbooks with laptops. Every student gets a laptop and the cost isn’t going to be significantly higher as the cost of textbooks for all classes will exceed the costs of the laptops.

Duke University is giving every freshman an iPod. The iPod comes preloaded with university information and can be used to record lectures and yes, download and listen to music.

My belief is that at some point and it may be sooner than we think, we need 1-1 computing for all students. One to one portable as well. Be it a PDA, laptop or some other technology, it’s coming. I hope we don’t get caught sleeping and miss out on providing students with the kind of education they need as they enter the 21st century.

Any thoughts?

The power of the internet is hard to understand sometimes.

Working with students at King George on Wednesday, they were determined to achieve perfection. As we were shooting segments for their news broadcast, they kept wanting to redo scenes over and over again. I finally had to tell them we only have so much time and they would have to settle for something less than perfection.

Why were they so concerned about the quality of their work? Are they simply perfectionists? Are they this way about all their work?

I think knowing they will have a larger audience makes all the difference. A website called fanfiction illustrates this point well.

Why worry about work that only one person will see, when you can share you work with thousands?

This is what the King George students were essentially telling me.